Prior to JDK 6, we can check if a string is empty in 2 ways:
Support from JDK6
Checking its length is more readable and may be a little faster. Starting from JDK 6, String class has a new convenience method isEmpty():
boolean isEmpty()
Returns true if, and only if, length() is 0.
It is just a shorthand for checking length. Of course, if the String is null, you will still get NullPointerException.
I don't see much value in adding this convenience method. Instead,
I'd like to see a static utility method that also handle null value:
public static boolean notEmpty(String s) {
return (s != null && s.length() > 0);
}
Support from StringUtils
Another option, use StringUtils.isEmpty(String str) of Apache commons , can be downloaded from - http://commons.apache.org/
It checks for null string also and return true for empty
if(s != null && s.length() == 0)
//OR
if(("").equals(s))
Support from JDK6
Checking its length is more readable and may be a little faster. Starting from JDK 6, String class has a new convenience method isEmpty():
boolean isEmpty()
Returns true if, and only if, length() is 0.
It is just a shorthand for checking length. Of course, if the String is null, you will still get NullPointerException.
I don't see much value in adding this convenience method. Instead,
I'd like to see a static utility method that also handle null value:
public static boolean notEmpty(String s) {
return (s != null && s.length() > 0);
}
Support from StringUtils
Another option, use StringUtils.isEmpty(String str) of Apache commons , can be downloaded from - http://commons.apache.org/
It checks for null string also and return true for empty
public static boolean isEmpty(String str) {
return str == null str.length() == 0;
}
No comments:
Post a Comment